boomgray5.jpg
title10.jpg

Bio

livingroom_100x113.jpgIn 2006, I founded ZapBoom Consulting,  which specializes in the analysis of how digital tools like cell phones and the Internet can be used in social change campaigns in developing countries.  I have researched and written reports on topics ranging from online citizen journalism to blog advocacy and internet censorship.  I have also performed in-country Internet monitoring and international conference organizing. 

You can contact me at MaryCJoyce AT gmail DOT com.

Read full bio....

Client Buzz

Feedback from Zapboom Clients:

"Mary's passion and energy for digital activism is obvious in every action and initiative she makes."...read more

"Right away she cut to the core of our needs."...read more

"She deserves much of the credit for organizing a tremendously successful event."...read more

"She was able to turn a potentially complex technical task into something that brought all the different viewpoints together and channelled everyone's energy in a collaborative manner."...read more

Digital Activism Projects

Current CV

Double-click the image to download.

CV_jan19_200px.jpg 

Rayt - The Power of the Comment

Posted by Mary on 07/07/2007 at 10:45


Wouldn't you love to leave a comment on this site?

Where We Are Today

Skewed as it is towards the western, wealthy, and white, the internet is the best proxy we have for the world in which we live. Every government has a website, every large corporation, every international clothing store or fast food chain, every nation-wide newspaper, every major NGO, every pharmaceutical company. These organizations - through commerce, charity, or force - govern our world. They govern us. Shouldn't we have the right to publicly comment on them?

In many countries, we do have the right to publicly comment, but they never hear us, and not many other people do either. We whine to our co-workers and friends about this or that ridiculous policy, complain to our friends about the malfeasance of this or that corporation. Sometimes we even sign an online petition to save Darfur, save the environment, oppose a piece of legislation. But we don't know if our voices are really heard. Those who govern our world are so far away, so self-isolated. How can our opinions about them be as clear to the world and the marketing slogans they create to promote themselves? The secret is on the internet.

How Rating and Review Works

The idea of "user rating and review" is no longer foreign to most internet users. We rate products on Amazon. We rate movies on IMDB. Even blog comments are a form of rating and review. We review a product or an idea then we rate it: excellent, average, or horrible.

But until now, what we were able to rate and review was completely at the mercy of the website. Amazon wants us to rate and review their products, so they put a rating and review feature on their site and IMDB does likewise. But does the White House want us to rate and review Bush's last speech? Nope. You'll find no comment feature on whitehouse.gov. Does Pfizer want you to rate its policy for testing AIDS drugs? Looks like they didn't put a comments section on their homepage either.

There are some currently-available methods for commenting on websites. Del.icio.us allows users to tag a website with any word they want. Del.icio.us then creates webpages that bring together all the websites tagged with a certain word. For example, if you tagged Whitehouse.gov with the word "reckless," then that page would appear in a list on the del.icio.us page for the tag "reckless." The problem with del.icio.us is that you must go to the del.icio.us site to see the tags and that del.icio.us is not used by the public at large. If you tag the web using del.icio.us you audience will be limited.

How to Leave a Comment on Any Site

But this need not be the case. It is possible to comment on a webpage and for the comment to appear on the page itself so others can see it. (Warning: some technical jargon follows)

What I have in mind is a browser add-on (very easy in Firefox) so that a banner would appear at the top of webpages displaying comments made about that page. This banner would not be part of the script of the page, but would rather be part of the browser. When a person visited a webpage, they could choose to leave a comment by clicking a link on the browser's toolbar, similar to the way del.icio.us users can tag a page. That person's comment would then be linked to the URL, so the next person with the add-on (let's call it Rayt) would be able to see the previous person's comment, like this:

rayt-example3.jpg

How I imagine the Rayt banner would look on a webpage


If you were a Rayt member, you would see the comments of other Rayt members in your web browser whenever you visited a URL with a comment linked to it. The possibilities are endless: commenting on the Iraq war on the White House site, commenting on obesity and diabetes on MacDonalds site, commenting on blood diamonds on the De Beers site.

And these organizations would have to listen, because when people visited their sites they wouldn't see just the company's message - a sparkling logo, a press release. Above that site visitors would see the people's message - showing the organization's dirt laundry for all to see. The organizations couldn't control or block these comments, because the comments would not be a part of their site, but rather part of the browsers of millions of individuals and the Rayt servers.

Nuts and Bolts

Here's some nitty-gritty about how it would work: Each partial comment diplayed on the banner would be a link. If you clicked on the link a pop-up would appear that you give you access to the whole comment and also an opportunity to rate the comment or mark it as spam. This would move good comments to the front of the banner, the bad ones to the back, and delete the spam. You could also use the rating system to limit the comments you saw. You could choose to display all comments or just the comments that are highly rated.

The program would exist in different languages (different Firefox add-ons to download). The commenting would be anonymous to protect say, someone who wanted to comment on a government website in China, but the comment rating system would prevent anonymous spamming.

I imagine that it would work something like Wikipedia. Rayting websites would become a hobby and people would add comments to important websites as a public service (like writing about blood diamonds on the De Beers).

The Up-Shot

In short, Rayt would make the entire web a free speech zone, where governments and corporations would have no more power over their public image than ordinary citizens.


Wow!

Sent by Joe Solomon on 09/07/2007 at 05:41 PM


This is an absolutely brilliant idea! 

I hope you can help it come to fruition - although just by posting it, perhaps this is all that's needed to execute its inevitable creation.

I've thought of adding an add-on that would allow you to rate each site.  Perhaps on the 1-5 star scale like Amazon's.  This would be an easy way to allow end-users to vote on the usefullness of sites that could be combined to google's page-rank algorithm for more efficient and people-driven results.  Kind of like what you're saying about bringing the power of del.icio.us to the front lines. 

Your idea takes this forward in leaps and bounds.  It forces transparency - it forces discussion - it forces change.

 Absolutely brilliant!


Thanks,

Sent by on 13/07/2007 at 10:46 PM
Mary
Thanks, Joe, for your high 5.  I was thinking of a 1 to 5 system, in addition to the comments.  By the way, this is a great way to put it: "bringing the power of del.icio.us to the front lines."

Insights From Third Voice

Sent by Joe Solomon on 20/07/2007 at 12:01 AM

Mary -

Your idea (Rayt) has really stuck with me and I've been discussing it with friends and even brought it up @ AspirationTech's latest eAdvocacy conference!

What I found out:

A group tried to create a similar model akin to Rayt's in the late 90s. A Wired article from 2001 summarizes it pretty well:

"In 1999... launched Third Voice, a free browser plug-in that allowed Web surfers to annotate any site with their comments. The idea was to spark 'inline discussions' among Web users, promoting a new civic mindedness that would keep corporations, government and the media honest."

From some googl-ing I did (searching "third" + "voice") I found out that there was a bunch of spam that got injected into the system but that the development team was considering "exploring the use of peer ratings (which would allow users to filter notes based on the author's reputation)"

Apparently, though, these peer ratings never got a chance to come to fruition. Third Voice discontinued its service in early 2001.

This was largely a result of a poor revenue model. The advertisement model, which drives much of the innovation we're seeing today, didn't seem to cut it for the Third Voice folks.

It's also important to realize that it was a couple years ahead of its time. Transparency didn't go over well with many webmasters back in the day. Plus I don't think there was the online culture shift towards collaboration and user-driven reviews which is evident from the obvious successes of Wikipedia and Amazon. Two political scientists from the University of Ohio speculated in 2000 that Third Voice was "unlikely to amount to much because they require initiative on the part of users...[The web] has become a mass medium used mostly by relatively passive consumers, and as such major content providers will dominate it." Not only did these two political scientists ironically public their original article on the web, but I bet they've since changed their mind with the explosion of the blogosphere.

Imagine if Third Voice got a second go-round right now, though? That's what really excites me about Rayt. We actually have a working model of what was largely a success. So it's less about bringing vaporware to life as much as it is about bringing back to life realware whose time has finally come. With some changes, of course.

It would definitely need a way to sift out the spam as well as to encourage debate and fact-referencing over extreme opinions that aren't grounded.

In addition to the commenting feature, perhaps there could be a wiki-like feature - wherein people could collaborate on creating an overlay of the website in question. Imagine if people could leave notes on the site itself - critiquing certain statistics or highlighting the small print for example. Kind of like this amazing counter-advertisement of a Blue Cross ad: http://www.sickofbluecross.com/assets/uploads/blue_cross_ad1.jpg

I wonder if this could be successfully collaborated on by an online community. I imagine there would be constant revisions and the overlay would be in unpredictable flux. The original webmaster might also try to remove controversial stuff that was posted by the community. Perhaps if the changes themselves could be voted on, it would require that same number of votes to remove them. I'm still thinking about how this would work...

I see Rayt as being an open-source project - something created by the online community for the online community. I also see it structured as less of another web 2.0 project and more of a social change experiment. I think the reason that all of these ways to mark up the web haven't fallen under our radar is because they're not built to change the world. Rayt would have to be built with that in mind in order for it to have its intended maximum impact.

I'd totally like to be kept in the loop as you continue to explore this great idea...

--Joe

PS - You can view Third Voice's old page here.


Thanks Joe

Sent by on 20/07/2007 at 03:16 PM
Mary

added as a a post on the Rayt blog:

http://rayt.bligoo.com/content/view/55501/Learning_from_the_ThirdVoice_experience.html 







Suscribe to this article comments in RSS

Quote of the Week

"Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek."

-Barack Obama

What is Digital Activism?

Digital activism means grassroots activists using digital technologies like cell phones and the internet to increase their impact, thus subverting traditional power hierarchies and changing the world.

The Blog Advocacy Guide

        

Click image to download! 

Zapping the Boom

There is 1 person browsing "ZapBoom" at the moment.

Recent comments

RSS