boomgray5.jpg
title10.jpg

Bio

livingroom_100x113.jpgIn 2006, I founded ZapBoom Consulting,  which specializes in the analysis of how digital tools like cell phones and the Internet can be used in social change campaigns in developing countries.  I have researched and written reports on topics ranging from online citizen journalism to blog advocacy and internet censorship.  I have also performed in-country Internet monitoring and international conference organizing. 

You can contact me at MaryCJoyce AT gmail DOT com.

Read full bio....

Client Buzz

Feedback from Zapboom Clients:

"Mary's passion and energy for digital activism is obvious in every action and initiative she makes."...read more

"Right away she cut to the core of our needs."...read more

"She deserves much of the credit for organizing a tremendously successful event."...read more

"She was able to turn a potentially complex technical task into something that brought all the different viewpoints together and channelled everyone's energy in a collaborative manner."...read more

Digital Activism Projects

Current CV

Double-click the image to download.

CV_jan19_200px.jpg 

The Internet That Was

Posted by Mary on 21/08/2007 at 15:11

Why do people want to be "on the Internet?" One of the main reasons is simple freedom. The Internet is a rare example of a true, modern, functional anarchy. There is no "Internet Inc." There are no official censors, no bosses, no board of directors, no stockholders.

Today that paragraph, written in 1993, seems naive and ill-informed. There certainly are censors on the Internet. Look at China and Saudi Arabia. While there is no "Internet Inc." the Internet is most certainly a commercial entity with its associated "bosses," "boards of directors" and "stockholders." I am not just talking about the companies that exist because of the Internet - Google, Yahoo, America Online. There is hardly a business in America which is not somehow making money from the Internet. Banks cut costs by sending balance statements by e-mail. Retailers sell every imaginable product online. The dream of a free non-capitalist space on the Internet seems foolish.

Yet this is how people saw the Internet when it was born in 1991. It was going to change the world. Science fiction writer Bruce Sterling, who wrote the paragraph that began this post, wasn't the only person who saw the Internet as a utopian space where freedom would reign.

People thought that the Internet would change the world. Instead, the world changed in the Internet.

We live in a capitalistic and hirarchical world and for the most part the Internet is a reflection of that. It didn't bring freedom, either economic or politically. Rich people have better access to the Internet and create most of the Internet's content. The Internet also hasn't changed world politics. People who live in countries with limited civil liberties have limited freedoms online as well.

This doesn't have to be the case. The early theorists of the Internet weren't wrong when they dreamed that the Internet could change the world. It still can. One way is by collectively redefining the Internet, one web page at a time. That is what I am doing with Rayt. Redefining the Internet democratically is just one way reclaim the Internet that was. We can still create an Internet that will change. We just need to believe it is possible.


Amazing Article!

Sent by on 21/08/2007 at 09:01 PM
Joe Solomon

 

Mary - you've so eloquently described how far the internet has to go before it is a truly democratic space.  I think people get carried away with buzz words like web 2.0 and forget that much of the web is still very much under control & subject to censorship.

It would be great to see hyperlinked examples of what's going on in China and Saudi Arabia.

Also, if Rayt was up and running, I would definitely give this article 5 stars.  It's pretty kick-ass.


Thanks!&nb

Sent by on 22/08/2007 at 02:08 AM
Mary
Thanks!  You can read about censorship in China, Saudi Arabia, and other countries here.

mmmmmhhh !!!!

Sent by on 21/08/2007 at 10:32 PM
Leonardo Maldonado

Yes but no

I agree in most of what you're saying.... never the less,  the access of Internet of 1 out of six citizens of this planet is the most democratic event in the history of mankind..... and the fact that anyone with this access can express his opinion is a liberty never heard before  ... I am with you in expanding this phemomenon but you can ´t deny that it has changed the world and made it more transparent and given voice to those who never had it

Cariños 


Hey

Sent by on 22/08/2007 at 02:10 AM
Mary

Hey Leo.  To your comment I would also say yes but no ;) 

You are right that the Internet provides an unprecedented platform for the freedom of knowledge, thought, and communication.  However, I think these phenomena have had the greatest impact on cultures that are already free, like the Us, Europe, and parts of Asia.  In countries that are less free (like China) I would say the the impact of the Internet has been more economic and social but apolitical.  I still think the world has so far shaped the Internet rather than the Internet shaping the world.

But if Chinese people use the Internet to organize for democracy, I guess that would prove me wrong. 


Mary, the

Sent by Dossy Shiobara on 22/08/2007 at 02:19 PM

Mary, the funny synchronicity is that Bruce wrote that right before the September that never ended.  If he'd written it only a year later, I bet the screed would have come out totally different.

The reason why the Internet works is because it isn't a democracy. It's a meritocracy--those who actually "do", get to decide how things get done. People who complain still have a venue to post their rants, but in the end that's all they are.


But

Sent by on 22/08/2007 at 04:34 PM
Mary
But it's not a completely fair meritocracy.  People with more money to create content have a bigger footprint.

"Peop

Sent by Dossy Shiobara on 25/08/2007 at 03:10 PM

"People with more money to create content have a bigger footprint."

That's not wholly true.  Look at Larry and Sergey--starting with practically no money with their "BackRub" search engine--eventually building an organization which effects significant change in the Internet ecosystem.

Again: it happened because they were do-ers. They started with very limited funds, decided to actually build something, and brought about change.

It's a capitalist meritocracy, for sure: those who do, are rewarded by the marketplace with money. I don't see anything wrong with that model. 


Yes, but

Sent by on 27/08/2007 at 01:28 PM
Mary
Yes, but you need money to bring an idea to fruition.  I guarantee you Sergey and Larry either had VC funding or used their own money.  Without your own money to invest or connections to people who do have money, it is difficult to act on an idea.  The most common way that people raise money to start a business is by borrowing against their homes.  But what if you don't own a home?  People without finacial resources are disadvantaged even in the internet age.

hello

Sent by on 26/08/2007 at 12:42 PM
rodrigo albornoz pollmann
my name is rodrigo. I will be reading

 

-----------------
rodrigo albornoz pollmann




Glad to

Sent by on 26/08/2007 at 09:21 PM
Mary
Glad to have you, Rodrigo!  I will be writing.

Third Voice

Sent by Leo on 23/09/2007 at 01:12 AM

Rayt reminds me of another startup, which I remembered from the wonderful summer of `99 and have thought about every so-often since then... a company called Third Voice.

I just now Googled the site, to see what had happened. Here's a Wired article that I suppose could be called an obituary:

http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/04/42803

I remember loving the idea of Third Voice, and I'm very curious as to how you plan to avoid those same pitfalls...

Leo







Suscribe to this article comments in RSS

Quote of the Week

"Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek."

-Barack Obama

What is Digital Activism?

Digital activism means grassroots activists using digital technologies like cell phones and the internet to increase their impact, thus subverting traditional power hierarchies and changing the world.

The Blog Advocacy Guide

        

Click image to download! 

Zapping the Boom

There is 1 person browsing "ZapBoom" at the moment.

Recent comments

RSS